notication icon
Understanding the Impact of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

Understanding the Impact of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation


Today, we're diving into the fascinating world of noninvasive brain stimulation. You might have heard about how zapping the brain with controlled bursts of electricity can lead to behavioral changes or even enhance cognitive abilities, and have been alarmed or intrigued.Read on to discover the complexities of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and its impact on our brains.

The Promise and Reality of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

So, what's the deal with tES? It's been touted as a promising tool for altering brain activity in ways that could potentially benefit both our mental health and cognitive functions. Reports have claimed that tES can lead to improvements across a wide range of cognitive processes and even offer potential relief for various neuropsychiatric disorders. It all sounds quite impressive, doesn't it?

But here's the catch – despite the hype surrounding tES, our understanding of how it truly influences brain activity and subsequently affects behavior is still quite limited. The gap between the potential promise of tES and our mechanistic understanding of its effects seems to be wider than we'd like it to be. It's like having a shiny new toy without fully understanding how it works or the potential consequences of using it.

Challenging Assumptions and Bridging Gaps

In a world where the excitement for tES is palpable, there's a pressing need to challenge common assumptions and interpretations of its effects. We're talking about the need to bridge the gaps in our understanding of the behavioral and neural consequences of tES. It's not just about zapping the brain and hoping for the best – we need to delve deeper into the mechanisms at play.

One of the key questions that arises is: What are the theoretical foundations for the use of tES, and how can we strengthen these foundations? Usefully applying an electrical field to the brain is no simple feat, and the effects it induces are far from straightforward. There's a distinction between understanding the physiological effects of tES and its impact on behavior. Confusing these two levels of description can lead to widespread misunderstanding, as highlighted by the disparity between the portrayal of tES in the media and the actual evidence supporting it.

The Complex Physiology of tES

Let's talk about transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which has emerged as a prominent player in the realm of neurostimulation. Despite its apparent simplicity, the physiology of tES is anything but straightforward. Evidence from various studies suggests that the effects of tES extend beyond the cortex underneath the electrode, with simulations indicating a widespread and intricate distribution of induced currents that can influence both cortical and subcortical regions of the brain.

The Need for Finessed Ways to Interrogate the Effects of tES

So, where does that leave us? It's evident that we need more nuanced approaches to interrogate the effects of tES. This calls for the development of appropriate explanatory models that can shed light on the consequences tES has on neural activity. Enter computational neurostimulation – the development of biologically plausible models and neural networks that can simulate the effects of neurostimulation and generate predictions about its physiological and behavioral impact. These models could serve as invaluable tools in formulating novel predictions about the effects of tES.

Unraveling the Mysteries

As we unravel the mysteries of tES, it's clear that there's still much to learn about its potential and its pitfalls. The journey to understanding the behavioral consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation is riddled with complexities, but it's a journey worth undertaking. By delving into the theoretical foundations, bridging the gaps in our understanding, and developing sophisticated models to interrogate its effects, we can hope to gain a deeper insight into the enigmatic world of tES.

So, the next time you come across a headline proclaiming the wonders of noninvasive brain stimulation, remember that there's more to the story than meets the eye. The road to unraveling the mysteries of tES may be winding, but the potential insights it holds for our understanding of the brain are truly awe-inspiring.

And there you have it – a glimpse into the intriguing world of noninvasive brain stimulation. Until next time, keep those neurons firing and your curiosity piqued!

Citation: Sven Bestmann, Archy O. De Berker, and James Bonaiuto, “Understanding the Behavioural Consequences of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19, no. 1 (2015): 13–20,


  • Physiological Effects: Physiological effects pertain to the impact of a treatment or intervention on the normal functioning of the body, including changes in neural activity, hormonal levels, or cellular processes.

  • Computational Neurostimulation: Computational neurostimulation involves the use of mathematical models and simulations to understand the effects of neurostimulation techniques on neural activity and behavior.

  • Biologically Plausible Models: Biologically plausible models are computational representations of neural networks and brain function that aim to mimic the biological processes underlying neural activity and cognitive functions.

  • Neural Networks: Neural networks are interconnected networks of neurons in the brain that work together to process information and regulate various functions, such as perception, learning, and memory.